tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8993773.post5595593486911327519..comments2023-10-26T06:07:33.593-07:00Comments on The Sidetrack: The Logiccraig41http://www.blogger.com/profile/06409161182886514439noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8993773.post-21948433996344287412008-02-19T14:06:00.000-07:002008-02-19T14:06:00.000-07:00It would be one thing to argue against warrants fo...It would be one thing to argue against warrants for surveillance if the intelligence people could site a specific example of when they lost critical intelligence because of a warrant. But if you read their statements, it isn't the intelligence community saying the expiration of the PAA and the requirement to get a warrant, or the retro-active immunity is key, it's the President saying it.<BR/><Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8993773.post-83078499471055398112008-02-18T15:00:00.000-07:002008-02-18T15:00:00.000-07:00That's about as concise as it gets. Great cartoon,...That's about as concise as it gets. <BR/><BR/>Great cartoon, too.Misty Fowlerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14913405400935977458noreply@blogger.com